I left Hong Kong in September 2022, a decision I made in February of the same year. It was an incredibly difficult time for me and for society as a whole. The National Security Law had been in effect for nearly a year, effectively silencing dissent, halting protests, and eroding Hong Kong’s autonomy. Criticizing the government became dangerous, and as an artist who had always responded to societal issues, I found it impossible to express myself or live freely in such a restrictive environment.
The COVID-19 pandemic further revealed the extent of the government’s authoritarian control. People were coerced into vaccination, much like in mainland China, and those who couldn’t or didn’t want to comply were marginalized. Doctors who tried to issue medical exemptions were arrested, showing how politics overshadowed professionalism and basic human rights. At that point, it became clear to me that Hong Kong had fundamentally changed.
The global context also weighed heavily on my decision. The Russian invasion of Ukraine occurred the same year, yet there was an unsettling silence in Hong Kong about the events. This reinforced my realization that Hong Kong was distancing itself from international values and aligning more closely with China and Russia. I saw no hope of the city returning to the open, global outlook it once had. With my family’s future in mind, I knew we had to leave.
The UK became our destination because of the British government’s historic responsibility to Hong Kong. In response to the National Security Law, they introduced a new immigration route specifically for British National (Overseas) passport holders. As I was born in British Hong Kong, I qualified for this visa. It was the most practical option in terms of cost, time, and process. Moreover, the UK’s legal system, values, and way of life—apart from the weather—were familiar to us due to Hong Kong’s colonial history. This alignment made it easier for us to restart our lives in a new yet somewhat familiar environment.